Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.79 seconds)
Nitin Kumar Bhagat vs The State Of Jharkhand Through The ... on 15 April, 2026 cites

Court In The Case Of Secretary, State Of ... vs . Uma on 9 April, 2015

19. The argument has been advanced that so far as the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka & Ors. Vs. Uma Devi (3) (supra) and Jaggo vs. Union of India and Ors. (supra) are concerned, the same are also not applicable in the facts of the present case since in both the cases, continuity in service was taken into consideration but herein, the services has not been continued said to be counting the period of 10 years of continuous service as has been stipulated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka & Ors. Vs. Uma Devi (3) (supra).
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 1 - Cited by 2142 - Full Document

Secretary, State Of Karnataka And ... vs Umadevi And Others on 10 April, 2006

23. Even going by the principles laid down in Umadevi (3) case [State of Karnataka v. Umadevi (3), (2006) 4 SCC 1 : 2006 SCC (L&S) 753] , we are of the opinion that the State of Punjab cannot be heard to say that the appellants are not entitled to be absorbed into the services of the State on permanent basis as their appointments were purely temporary and not against any sanctioned posts created by the State.
Supreme Court of India Cites 46 - Cited by 4959 - P K Balasubramanyan - Full Document

Narendra Kumar Tiwari & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors. .... .... Opp. ... on 14 January, 2019

29. The State of Jharkhand, based upon the aforesaid proposition, as has been laid down in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka & Ors. Vs. Uma Devi (3) (supra) coupled with the case of Narendra Kumar Tiwari & Ors. vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors. (supra) wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court has passed observation by giving liberty to the State to formulate a rule for regularization and in turn thereof, a Rule has been formulated in the year 2015 which has been made effective from 01.12.2015. The Rule contains a provision of constituting a committee for consideration of the case of one or the other daily rated employees on the basis of the principle as laid down in the aforesaid judgment.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 111 - A Sen - Full Document
1   2 Next