Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.17 seconds)

Charles. K. Skaria vs Dr.C.Mathew on 19 March, 1980

(Charles K. Skaria case) (supra) "20. There is nothing unreasonable or arbitrary in adding 10 marks for holders of a diploma. But to earn these extra 10 marks, the diploma must be obtained at least on or before the last date for application, not later. Proof of having obtained a diploma is different from the factum of having got it. Has the candidate, in fact, secured a diploma before the final date of application for admission to the degree course? That is the primary question. It is prudent to produce evidence of the diploma along with the application, but that is secondary. Relaxation of the date on the first is illegal, not so on the (Downloaded on 14/02/2023 at 10:45:38 PM) [2023/RJJP/002316] (6 of 8) [CW-1229/2022] second. Academic excellence, through a diploma for which extra mark is granted, cannot be denuded because proof is produced only later, yet before the date of actual selection. The emphasis is on the diploma; the proof thereof subserves the factum of possession of the diploma and is not an independent factor ..... Mode of proof is geared to the goal of the qualification in question. It is subversive of sound interpretation and realistic decoding of the prescription to telescope the two and make both mandatory in point of time.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 230 - V R Iyer - Full Document
1