Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.56 seconds)

Kajal vs Jagdish Chand on 5 February, 2020

31. If Kajal's case (supra) is referred when the petitioner was in the hospital her parents were attending the petitioner by leaving their work and as per the evidence of PW.5 they have engaged attendant for a period of nearly 3 months to look after the petitioner. Though petitioner has not proved that they have engaged attendant for a period of three months to look after the petitioner, but there is every reason to believe that the petitioner was looked after by her parents while she was in the hospital so also after her discharge by leaving their work. Hence, the court has to award compensation towards attendant's charges. Hence this court inclines to award compensation under the head attendance charges, conveyance and other incidental expenses to the tune of Rs.50,000/­.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 241 - D Gupta - Full Document

G Vivek vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. on 12 October, 2022

In a judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court in 2023 ACJ 585 between G. Vivek Vs. National Insurance Co.Ltd & Ors., In the said case, injured was minor aged about 12 years studying in 8th standard. The mishap occurred on 24­05­2011 while he was traveling in the bus. Because of the injuries sustained in the accident right leg of the SCCH-24 17 MVC 758/2019 injured was amputed. He has suffered 97% permanent disability in relation to the right lower limb, left lower limb and post traumatic amputation. In the said case the court has applied multiplier of 15 to calculate the loss of income, taking the notional income of the claimant at Rs.10,000/­ per month and added 50% towards future prospects and award compensation under the head loss of future income, it has awarded sum of Rs.26,00,000/­ towards cost of new prosthesis and for its maintenance.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next