Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.22 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Rajinder Singh vs Dalip Chand on 17 February, 1994
19. Learned counsel for the revision petitioner could not refer to
any citation where the Apex Court has taken a different view than the view
taken in case of Rajinder Singh (Dead) Vs. Dalip Chand and others
(supra). As per the law laid down in the aforesaid citation, landlord-
respondent No.1 had become entitled to seek ejectment of the revision
petitioner and the sub tenants after the expiry of 10 years' period for which
the lease was originally created.
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949
Shri Sardari Lal Jain Since Deceased ... vs Smt. Dhanwanti Devi W/O Shri Pahu Ram on 29 July, 2002
In case of Sardari Lal Jain Vs. Smt. Dhanwanti Devi (supra),
a Single Bench of this Court has observed that second petition based on
same cause of action is not maintainable under Order 23 Rule 1 CPC.
Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001
Ram Dass vs Sukhdev Kaur And Anr. on 7 April, 1981
31. The question in the above petition before the Division Bench
was as to whether during the pendency of the appeal, an application to
withdraw the eviction application with permission to file fresh application
was maintainable. The observations in the above case are not strictly
applicable to the facts of the present case.
Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. vs Dilbahar Singh on 27 August, 2014
13. Before proceeding further, it will be relevant to note that in the
revision petition, the scope of appreciation of evidence recorded before the
Rent Controller/Appellate Authority is quite limited. The finding of fact
recorded by the Courts below can be interfered only if the same are legally
not sustainable, perverse, against facts proved on file or evidence on record
has been ignored or wrongly interpreted. Hon'ble Apex Court, while
6 of 21
::: Downloaded on - 08-07-2018 22:59:48 :::
CR-6011-2001 -7-
describing the scope of interference in revision petition, has observed in
case of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd Vs. Dilbahar Singh 2014(9)
SCC 78, as follows: