Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.22 seconds)
Sharinath Das Gupta vs Board Of Secondary Education on 15 March, 2018 cites

Ku. Neha Indurkhya vs M.P. Board Of Secondary Education on 23 April, 2003

Along with the reply, the respondent has filed relevant part of the Regulation No.119 according to which any candidate who has appeared in Class-XII examination may apply to the Secretary for verification whether the candidate's answer in particular subject have all been examined and there has been no mistake in totalling of the marks in that subject, but not for evaluation of answer. Vide order dated 02.07.2017, the petitioner has been informed that there is no provision of revaluation, hence, his application for revaluation has been rejected. The respondent Board has placed reliance over the judgment passed by this Court in case of Neha Indurkhya Vs. M.P. Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal, reported in 2003(3) MPHT 311 by submitting that the revaluation is not permissible under the Rules and regulations.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 79 - R Gupta - Full Document

Maharashtra State Board Of Secondary ... vs Paritosh Bhupesh Kumar Sheth Etc on 17 July, 1984

In the case of Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education v/s Paritosh Bhupeshkurmar Sheth [AIR 1984 SC 1543] and in the case of Pramod Kumar Srivastava v/s Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission [AIR 2004 SC 4116], the Apex Court has held that under the relevant rules, when there is no provision then a candidate may not be entitled to ask for revaluation of his answer-book.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 990 - V B Eradi - Full Document

Pramod Kumar Srivastava vs Chairman, Bihar Public Service ... on 6 August, 2004

In the case of Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education v/s Paritosh Bhupeshkurmar Sheth [AIR 1984 SC 1543] and in the case of Pramod Kumar Srivastava v/s Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission [AIR 2004 SC 4116], the Apex Court has held that under the relevant rules, when there is no provision then a candidate may not be entitled to ask for revaluation of his answer-book.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 410 - G P Mathur - Full Document

Prem Ratan Agrawal vs Board Of Secondary Education And Ors. on 18 February, 2002

In the case of Prem Ratan Agrawal v/s Board of Secondary Education [2002 (2) MPHT 570]; Board of Secondary Education v/s Rajeev Gupta [L.P.A. No.295 of 2001 - decided on 26.02.2004] this Court has held that as general rule the Court has no power to order for revaluation of the answer-sheet since the rule do not provide for revaluation, 4 however, in extra ordinary case where student is bright and when injustice have been done, then in such cases revaluation of marks can be done specially in the case of Mathematics and Science. It is open to the Court to have a look at the answer sheet and compared with the model paper and if there are gross discrepancies in the answer book, then it is always open to the Court to call expert valuer of subject to re-evaluate the marks in the Court itself.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 27 - D Misra - Full Document

Central Board Of Secondary Education vs A. V. N. School Rajeev Nagar & Anr on 15 December, 2015

In the case of Prem Ratan Agrawal v/s Board of Secondary Education [2002 (2) MPHT 570]; Board of Secondary Education v/s Rajeev Gupta [L.P.A. No.295 of 2001 - decided on 26.02.2004] this Court has held that as general rule the Court has no power to order for revaluation of the answer-sheet since the rule do not provide for revaluation, 4 however, in extra ordinary case where student is bright and when injustice have been done, then in such cases revaluation of marks can be done specially in the case of Mathematics and Science. It is open to the Court to have a look at the answer sheet and compared with the model paper and if there are gross discrepancies in the answer book, then it is always open to the Court to call expert valuer of subject to re-evaluate the marks in the Court itself.
Patna High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 24 - C S Singh - Full Document
1   2 Next