Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.19 seconds)The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 50 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
State Of Haryana And Another vs Devender Kishore on 13 February, 2009
(CHETNA SINGH)
MMÂ08(South)/29.08.2011
7
State Vs. Devender
FIR No. 280/01
PS : Sabzi Mandi
U/s 39 of IE Act
27.08.2011
Present : Ld. APP for the state.
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
(Smt.) Smita Pandurang Dalvi, Of Bombay ... vs Ratnakar Dattatraya Patade, Of Bombay, ... on 26 February, 2002
In another case, Jagannath Singh Vs. B.S,. Ramaswamy, 1966 A.I.R.
(SC) 849, it was observed that energy may be dishonestly abstracted by artificial
means or unauthorized devices. For instance, energy before it passes through a
consumer's meter may be abstracted from the main of the electric company by an
unauthorized wire connecting the main with a private terminal; the connecting wire is
the artificial means for abstraction.
Section 2 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Ram Chander Prasad Sharma vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 8 February, 1966
10. It has been held by the Supreme Court in Ram Chandra Prasad Sharma,
Vs. State of Bihar (1967 A.I.R. (SC) 349) that such artificial means must be a
'perfected' artificial means shown to be in possession and control of the accused.
Perfected artificial means denotes a wire or any other foreign matter which on being
introduced in the meter would have the effect of stopping or retarding the progress of
meter. Further the accused must be shown to be a consumer within the meaning of
Section 2(c) of the Act.
1