Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.25 seconds)Section 12 in The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Smt. Mamta Jaiswal vs Rajesh Jaiswal on 24 March, 2000
In Smt.Mamta Jaiswal vs. Rajesh Jaiswal 2000(3)
MPLJ 100, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh while dealing
with identical situation observed that well qualified spouses
desirous of remaining idle, not making efforts for the purpose
of finding out a source of livelihood, have to be discouraged, if
the society wants to progress. For better appreciation, relevant
paragraphs of the said decision are reproduced hereunder:-
Section 21 in The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 23 in The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 20 in The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
State Of Maharashtra vs Sujay Mangesh Poyarelar on 19 September, 2008
In State of Maharashtra vs. Sujay Mangesh
Poyarekar (2008) 9 SCC 475 it was held that powers of the
revisional courts are very limited and the revisional court
should not interfere unless there is a jurisdictional error or an
error of law is noticed.
1