Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.65 seconds)

Coir Board Ernakulam Kerala State & Anr. vs Indira Devi P.S. & Ors. on 10 November, 1998

19. As per the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses, the sample of liquor and case property were sealed by the investigating officer with the seal of 'BSM'. However, the PWs have not deposed qua the handing over of the said seals to any other witness or police official and no handing over memo regarding the same was prepared. The seal in the present case was not handed over to any independent witness nor was it deposited in the FIR No. 726/2023 Page No. 13/18 CR Cases 2153/2024 State Vs. Indra Devi malkhana to assail the possibility of its misuse. Thus, the possibility that the case property may have been tampered with cannot be ruled out.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 34 - Full Document

Pawan Kumar vs The Delhi Administration on 17 August, 1987

Ram Raj for registration of FIR to the PS, however, admittedly seizure memo Ex. PW-1/A has been prepared by IO prior to sending the Constable to the PS for registration of FIR. It is, therefore, clear that the seizure memos of the liquor must have been prepared at the spot before the rukka was sent to the police station for registration of the FIR. A perusal of the seizure memo reveals that it contains the FIR details, thus raising a valid doubt in the mind of this court as to how it was made before the FIR was lodged and still contained the FIR details. Accordingly, it follows that the number of the FIR would have come to the knowledge of the investigating officer only after a copy of the FIR was brought to the spot by Ct. Ram Raj. Thus, ordinarily, the FIR number should not find mention in the seizure memo, which came into existence before registration of the FIR. However, interestingly, the seizure memo Ex. PW-1/A bear the FIR number and case details in the same ink and the same handwriting in which the said documents are prepared. The same indicates that FIR number was mentioned on the said documents while preparing the same. Reliance here is placed on the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Pawan Kumar v. The Delhi Administration, 1989 Cri. L.J. 127, wherein it was observed paragraph 5 as under:
Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 3061 - Full Document
1   2 Next