Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.27 seconds)Section 139 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 138 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 138 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
V. Raja Kumari vs P. Subbarama Naidu & Anr on 2 November, 2004
9.1 The Sessions Court without discussing the
merits of the case has erred in setting aside the well
reasoned judgment of the trial Court, only on the ground
that the power of attorney is not proved. The Sessions
Court has also erred in holding that there was no valid
demand notice and the notice at Ex.P14 is not signed by
the complainant, but it is signed by her husband. It has
6
also erred in holding that the demand notice is not served
on the accused, though it is duly sent to the address of the
accused and it is received by one of his subordinates and it
bares seal of accused. The findings of the Sessions Court is
contrary to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court
reported in V.Raja Kumari Vs. P.Subbarama Naidu & Anr.
(V.Raja Kumari)1 and K.Bhaskaran Vs. Sankaran Vaidhyan
Balan & Another (K.Bhaskaran)2.
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
K. Bhaskaran vs Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan And Anr on 29 September, 1999
9.1 The Sessions Court without discussing the
merits of the case has erred in setting aside the well
reasoned judgment of the trial Court, only on the ground
that the power of attorney is not proved. The Sessions
Court has also erred in holding that there was no valid
demand notice and the notice at Ex.P14 is not signed by
the complainant, but it is signed by her husband. It has
6
also erred in holding that the demand notice is not served
on the accused, though it is duly sent to the address of the
accused and it is received by one of his subordinates and it
bares seal of accused. The findings of the Sessions Court is
contrary to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court
reported in V.Raja Kumari Vs. P.Subbarama Naidu & Anr.
(V.Raja Kumari)1 and K.Bhaskaran Vs. Sankaran Vaidhyan
Balan & Another (K.Bhaskaran)2.
Section 27 in The General Clauses Act, 1897 [Entire Act]
The Powers-Of-Attorney Act, 1882
Ranjitha Balasubramanian And Anr. vs Shanthi Group And Ors. on 12 December, 2006
1