Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.24 seconds)Section 12 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 73 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 13 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 40 in The Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 [Entire Act]
Indian Oil Corp.Ltd.& Ors vs M/S Raja Transport(P) Ltd on 24 August, 2009
5. The Supreme Court in its decision in Indian Oil Corporation
(supra) held that while the fact that a named arbitrator is an
employee of one of the parties is not ipso facto a ground to raise a
presumption of bias or partiality or lack of independence on his part,
there may be a justifiable apprehension about the independence or
impartiality of an employee arbitrator, if the person was the
controlling or the dealing authority in regard to the subject contract
or if he was a direct subordinate of the officer whose decision is the
subject matter of the dispute. In such a case if any circumstance
exists to create a reasonable apprehension about the impartiality or
independence of the named arbitrator, the Court has a discretion not
to appoint such a person.
The Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949
Section 9 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 18 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 75 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
1