Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.27 seconds)Ravindra Kumar Misra vs U.P. State Handloom Corporation Ltd. & ... on 15 October, 1987
6) In Ravindra Kumar v. State of U.P. (2024), the Supreme Court explicitly
stated that non-disclosure of a criminal case that ended in acquittal is
not always fatal for employment. The court must check if the
suppression was "wilful" or a "bona fide" mistake. The courts have
warned against "broad-brushing" every instance of non-disclosure as a
disqualification. The Andhra Pradesh High Court itself has noted that
such rigidness is "completely oblivious to ground realities" and each
case must be assessed on its own merits.
Section 148 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 147 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Ram Chandra Kailash Kumar And Company ... vs State Of U.P. And Anr. on 25 March, 1980
In Ram Kumar vs. State of U.P. and others 5, the Apex Court
while granting relief in an identical facts, held as extracted herein under:
Ganesh Raja Patel vs The State Of Maharashtra And 2 Others on 10 March, 2023
In Mohammed Imran vs. State of Maharashtra and Others7, the Apex
Court made the following observation, as extracted herein under: