Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.23 seconds)Section 246 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 245 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 311 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Sayeeda Farhana Shamim vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 16 May, 2008
6. Per contra, Mrs. Ruby Pandey, learned A.P.P. appearing for the
opposite party-State submits that there is no illegality in the criminal
4
revision order and if no prejudice is caused to the petitioners, there is no
point of interference with the criminal revision order. She relied upon
paragraphs 6 and 8 of the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the case of Sayeed Farhana Shamim (supra). On these
grounds, she submits that this petition is fit to be dismissed.
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Sunil Mehta & Anr vs State Of Gujarat & Anr on 20 February, 2013
Section 244 Cr.P.C. was the subject matter in the
case of Sunil Mehta & another v. State of Gujarat & another ,
reported in (2013) 9 SCC 209 and while considering Sections 244, 245
and 246 Cr.P.C., the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that the difference lies in
the fact that while the former is a process that is conducted in the absence
of the accused, the latter is undertaken in his presence with an opportunity
to him to cross-examine the witnesses produced by the prosecution.
Paragraph 12 of the said judgment is quoted herein below:
Ajoy Kumar Ghose vs State Of Jharkhand & Anr on 18 March, 2009
9. Sections 244, 245 and 246 Cr.P.C were again the subject matter in the
judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ajoy
Kumar Ghose v. State of Jharkhand & another , reported in (2009)
14 SCC 115. Paragraphs 21 and 51 of the said judgment are quoted herein
below:
Kishor Tulsidas Choksi And Ors. (Also ... vs Appropriate Authority And Anr. on 5 June, 2007
5. Paragraph 7 of the said judgment is quoted herein below:
1