Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.24 seconds)
Pravesh Yadav vs State Of U.P. And Another on 17 March, 2020 cites

State Of U.P. vs Praveen Kumar Alias Kallu Yadav on 25 November, 2019

This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred seeking the quashing of charge sheet dated 24.09.2019 in S.S.T. No.04 of 2020 (State Vs. Pravesh Yadav), arising out of Case Crime No.0352 of 2019, under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(r) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Baksha, District Jaunpur, pending in the court of Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Jaunpur.
Allahabad High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 8 - P Diwaker - Full Document

Amrawati Devi And Another vs State Of U.P. Thru Collector Sultanpur ... on 16 July, 2019

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the applicant and after perusal of record, this Court is of the opinion that in the interest of justice, this application stands disposed of with the direction that the court below would extend the benefit of interim bail (if the court concerned deems it fit according to the merit of the case) as contemplated in the law laid down by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P., 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P., 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC), after the applicant surrenders within 45 days from today before the court below and if his bail application is filed, the same shall be adjudicated and decided by the courts below with speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, in the light of the judgment given by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Hussain and another Vs. Union of India, (2017) 5 SCC 702, relevant extract of the above judgment is quoted as under :-
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 10534 - Full Document

Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh vs State Of U.P.& Ors on 23 March, 2009

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the applicant and after perusal of record, this Court is of the opinion that in the interest of justice, this application stands disposed of with the direction that the court below would extend the benefit of interim bail (if the court concerned deems it fit according to the merit of the case) as contemplated in the law laid down by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P., 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P., 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC), after the applicant surrenders within 45 days from today before the court below and if his bail application is filed, the same shall be adjudicated and decided by the courts below with speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, in the light of the judgment given by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Hussain and another Vs. Union of India, (2017) 5 SCC 702, relevant extract of the above judgment is quoted as under :-
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 9870 - Full Document

Brahm Singh And Ors., Etc. vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 14 March, 1972

In the aforesaid backdrop, learned Sessions Judge and the concerned Trial Judge is directed to ensure that the guidelines given in the case of Hussain and another (supra) as well as in Brahm Singh and others (Supra) has to be carried out in its letter and spirit, further this Court hope and trust that there is no laxity in adhering the above directions.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 2297 - A N Grover - Full Document
1