Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.25 seconds)Section 26 in The Food Safety And Standards Act, 2006 [Entire Act]
The Food Safety And Standards Act, 2006
Section 51 in The Food Safety And Standards Act, 2006 [Entire Act]
State Govt Of Nct Of Delhi vs Jagdish Tyagi on 11 October, 2017
7. The Ld. Chief Public Prosecutor argued that as the powder is
prohibited in the milk, there is no question of showing percentage of
powder in the report. The milk powder was found in the sample and it was
not natural milk and the same has also been considered by the Ld. ADM
in the impugned order dt.28.02.2019. In the natural milk, no powder can
be mixed. The standards and parameters, which have been laid down by
the legislature are to be followed but the appellant has not followed it for
selling the milk in this case. The substandard milk is to be treated as an
adulterated article, even if it has not caused injuries to health. The
appellant did not comply with the standards of rules / regulations of Food
Safety and Standard Act. Therefore, the impugned order has been rightly
FSAT No. 10/19 Sh. Guru Dutt Sharma. vs. FSO & Anr. Page No. 4 of 7
passed by the Ld.ADM on the basis of the report, materials and evidence
on record.
Nemi Chand vs State Of Rajsthan Tr.Home Sec. on 24 November, 2015
No. 1412M of 1991 decided by
Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court on 16.12.1991; Sain Dass versus
The State of Haryana 2010 (1) FAC 17; State of Haryana versus Sat
Narain 2003 (2) FAC 378; Khyber Agro Farms Pvt. Ltd. versus The State
of Jammu and Kashmir & Ors. 2018 (2) FAC 254; Nemi Chand versus
State of Rajasthan 2016 (1) FAC 561 and State of Govt of NCT of Delhi
versus Jagdish Tyagi 2017(2) FAC 521.
Narain Dass Daulat Ram vs State Of Haryana And Anr. on 7 June, 1978
No. 1412M of 1991 decided by
Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court on 16.12.1991; Sain Dass versus
The State of Haryana 2010 (1) FAC 17; State of Haryana versus Sat
Narain 2003 (2) FAC 378; Khyber Agro Farms Pvt. Ltd. versus The State
of Jammu and Kashmir & Ors. 2018 (2) FAC 254; Nemi Chand versus
State of Rajasthan 2016 (1) FAC 561 and State of Govt of NCT of Delhi
versus Jagdish Tyagi 2017(2) FAC 521.
Raj Kumar vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 4 October, 2019
The Ld. Chief PP for the State, in support of his arguments
relied upon the judgment in the case of Raj Kumar versus The State of
Uttar Pradesh in Criminal Appeal No. 1541 of 2019 decided on
04.10.2019 by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India
Khyber Agro Farms Pvt Ltd vs The State Of Jammu And Kashmir on 30 October, 2017
No. 1412M of 1991 decided by
Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court on 16.12.1991; Sain Dass versus
The State of Haryana 2010 (1) FAC 17; State of Haryana versus Sat
Narain 2003 (2) FAC 378; Khyber Agro Farms Pvt. Ltd. versus The State
of Jammu and Kashmir & Ors. 2018 (2) FAC 254; Nemi Chand versus
State of Rajasthan 2016 (1) FAC 561 and State of Govt of NCT of Delhi
versus Jagdish Tyagi 2017(2) FAC 521.
Haryana State Indusl.& ... vs Sat Narain . on 24 March, 2014
No. 1412M of 1991 decided by
Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court on 16.12.1991; Sain Dass versus
The State of Haryana 2010 (1) FAC 17; State of Haryana versus Sat
Narain 2003 (2) FAC 378; Khyber Agro Farms Pvt. Ltd. versus The State
of Jammu and Kashmir & Ors. 2018 (2) FAC 254; Nemi Chand versus
State of Rajasthan 2016 (1) FAC 561 and State of Govt of NCT of Delhi
versus Jagdish Tyagi 2017(2) FAC 521.
1