Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 30 (0.29 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 304 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 164 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 201 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Sa vs Aa on 22 March, 2016
Furthermore, reliance placed by appellant on SA V. AA (supra)
is of no relevance to the instant case. As the facts and contents of the said
case are vague to the instant case.
Ankush Shivaji Gaikwad vs State Of Maharashtra on 3 May, 2013
In Ankush Shivaji Gaikwad (supra), the dog of the deceased started
barking on the accused. The accused hit the dog with an iron pipe that he
was carrying in his hand. The deceased objected to the beating of the dog
and this led to a verbal duel and scuffle between the two. The court accepted
the defence that the incident took place in a sudden fight without any pre-
meditation. The act of hitting the deceased was done in the heat of passion
CRL.A. 739/2017 Page 27 of 32
upon a sudden quarrel, and the appellants did not take undue advantage. Nor
they acted in a cruel or unusual manner while committing the offence. As
aforesaid, there was no pre-meditation; the weapon used was not lethal and;
the deceased was not given a second blow once he collapsed to the ground.
Mohd. Asif vs State Of Uttaranchal on 6 March, 2009
19. Thus we are of the opinion that the appellant has rightly been
found guilty of commission of offence under Section 302 and we place our
reliance on Dharumiah (supra), Aloke Nath Dutta (supra) and Mohd. Asif
(supra). Therefore, Judgment Dated 24.05.2017 and Order on Sentence
Dated 29.05.2017 passed by the learned Additional Session Judge is upheld.