Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (0.38 seconds)Oil And Natural Gas Commission vs Collector Of Central Excise on 7 January, 1994
12. Shri Ratnanko Banerjee, learned counsel appearing
with Shri Tarun Aich and Shri Ghanshyam Patel, learned
Advocates for BALCO would submit that the PMA could
resolve the disputes only when there is a dispute or
difference between the PSUs and the Government Departments
to avoid wastage of public money and time, as all the
inter departmental controversies may be settled at the
Government level only in the light of observations made by
the Supreme Court in Oil and Natural Gas Commission and
Another v. Collector of Central Excise1 and Oil and
Natural Gas Commission and Another v. Collector of Central
Excise2 Accordingly, several OMs were issued by the
Government of India on 12-3-1985, 29-3-1989, 31-12-1991 &
24-1-1994 for setting up the PMA.
Jindal Vijayanagar Steel (Jsw Steel ... vs Jindal Praxair Oxygen Company Ltd on 29 August, 2006
45. Reliance of the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner upon the decision of the Supreme Court rendered
in Jindal Vijayanagar Steel (supra) and upon the decision
of the Bombay High Court rendered in Fazlehussein
Haiderbhoy Buxamusa (supra) are not applicable to the
facts of the present case, as in both the cases the
territorial jurisdiction of a Court was under
Fazlehussein Haiderbhoy Buxamusa And ... vs Yusufally Adamji And Ors. on 2 August, 1950
45. Reliance of the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner upon the decision of the Supreme Court rendered
in Jindal Vijayanagar Steel (supra) and upon the decision
of the Bombay High Court rendered in Fazlehussein
Haiderbhoy Buxamusa (supra) are not applicable to the
facts of the present case, as in both the cases the
territorial jurisdiction of a Court was under
Eastern Coalfields Ltd vs Sanjay Transport Agnecy & Anr on 22 May, 2009
In support of his
contention, Shri Banerji relies on a decision of the
Supreme Court rendered in Eastern Coalfields Limited v.
Sanjay Transport Agency and Another5.
Balco Employees Union (Regd.) vs Union Of India & Ors on 10 December, 2001
40. The Supreme Court in BALCO Employees' Union (Regd.)
(supra) observed as under :
M.Dayanand Reddy vs A.P. Industrial Infrastructure ... on 24 March, 1993
In M. Dayanand Reddy v. A.P. Industrial
Infrastructure Corporation Limited and Others7, the
Supreme Court observed as under :
M/S.Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd vs M/S. Indo Swiss Synthetics Gem ... on 14 November, 1995
32. The Supreme Court in Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals
Ltd. v. Indo Swiss Synthetics Gem Mfg. Co. Ltd. and
Others8, has made it clear that the arbitration clause would
perish in case where either there is a substitution of a
new contract, or rescission or alternation of the original
contract.
National Insurance Co. Ltd vs M/S. Boghara Polyfab Pvt.Ltd on 18 September, 2008
In National Insurance Company Limited v. Boghara
Polyfab Private Limited9, the Supreme Court relied on
earlier decision in The Union of India v. Kishorilal Gupta
and Bros.10, observed as under :
The Union Of India vs Kishorilal Gupta And Bros on 21 May, 1959
In National Insurance Company Limited v. Boghara
Polyfab Private Limited9, the Supreme Court relied on
earlier decision in The Union of India v. Kishorilal Gupta
and Bros.10, observed as under :