Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.25 seconds)Section 436 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Inspector Of Police, T.N vs Palanisamy @ Selvan on 1 October, 2008
12. If we assume for the sake of argument that she had identified
accused by his voice, even as per the prosecution case, there was no
conversation between this witness and the accused. The accused is
said to have uttered only one sentence during the entire incident and
that was "Burn, nobody can save you." With regard to voice
identification, Supreme Court in the case of Inspector of Police,
T.N. vs. Palanisamy @ Selvan, (AIR 2009 SC 1012) has observed
that where the witnesses were not closely acquainted with the
accused and claimed to have identified the accused from short replies
given by him, evidence of identification by voice is not reliable.
Section 377 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Nilesh Dinkar Paradkar vs State Of Maharashtra on 9 March, 2011
Supreme Court has also observed in the case of Nilesh Dinkar
Paradkar vs. State of Maharashtra, [(2011) 4 SCC 143 at page
153] that evidence of voice identification is at best suspect, if not
wholly unreliable. Accurate voice identification is much more
difficult than visual identification. Though, this observation was
made by Supreme Court with reference to identification of voice on
the basis of recorded conversation; yet, the principles apply with
slightly less force to the identification of live voice as well.
Laxman vs State Of Maharashtra on 27 August, 2002
19. A constitution bench of the Supreme Court in the case of
Laxman vs. State of Maharashtra, [(2002) 6 SCC 710] affirming
the full bench judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Koli
Chunnilal Savji vs. State of Gujarat, (1999) 9 SCC 562 held that if
the person recording the dying declaration is satisfied that the
declarant was in fit mental condition to make the dying declaration
then such dying declaration would not be invalid solely on the
ground that doctor had not certified as to the condition of the
declarant to make the dying declaration.