Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (1.28 seconds)

Rishi Kumar Govil vs Maqsoodan And Ors on 28 March, 2007

Next argument raised by learned counsel for petitioner that the landlord who is residing at Ghasiyari Mandi is a better locality in comparison to the premises which is under the tenancy of the petitioner-tenant, so the application is liable to be rejected has got no force because as per settled position of law, the landlord is the best judge to chose the place place where he wants to live (See. Rishi Kumar Govil Vs. Maqsoodan and others, 2007 (2) ARC 1, Raghvendra Kumar Vs. Firm Prem Machinery and Co., AIR 2000 SC 534 : SCFBRC 24),.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 79 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Pyare Lal S/O Late Raghunandan & Ors. vs Additional District Judge, Court No.4 ... on 7 September, 2010

Keeping in view the abovesaid facts as well as facts of the present case that in the instant matter release application has been moved by the landlord on the ground that he wants that his one son should live separately in the accommodation which is under the tenancy of the petitioner in order to maintain peace in the family, is a good ground for moving release application in view of the law as laid down by this Court in the case of Pyare Lal Vs. XIIth Additional District Judge, Allahabad and others, 1990 (1) ARC 157, in paragraph No. 8 held as under:-
Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

Krishna Mohan Mahrotra vs Additional District Judge Court No.3 ... on 1 April, 2015

Accordingly, it is a sole domain of the Court to issue a commission or not and the local inspection or commission cannot be claimed as a matter of right by a party. And in the instant matter neither there is any dispute in respect to location of the premises for which release application is moved nor there is any dispute in regard to availability of the accommodation with the landlord and tenant and their family members (See. Krishna Mohan Mahrotra Vs. Additional District Judge Court No. 3, Lakhimpur & others, 2014 (4) ALJ 773). So, the argument in question has no force, rejected.
Allahabad High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1   2 Next