Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (2.09 seconds)Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 417 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Vijeta Gajra vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 8 July, 2010
In case of Vijeta Gajra Vs. State of NCT (2010) 11 SCC 618,
4 M.Cr.C.No. 11576/2015
621, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that :
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Geeta Mehrotra & Anr vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 17 October, 2012
In case of Geeta Mehrotra Vs. State of UP AIR 2013 SC
187, the Apex Court held that, "it appears from the FIR that there are no
allegations against the accused except casual reference of their names who
have been included in FIR but mere casual reference of the names of the
family members in a matrimonial dispute without allegation of active
involvement in the matter would not justify taking cognizance against
them overlooking the fact borne out of experience that there is a tendency
to involve the entire family members of the household in the domestic
quarrel taking place in the matrimonial disputes specially if it happens
soon after the wedding."
Preeti Gupta & Anr vs State Of Jharkhand & Anr on 13 August, 2010
13. Similarly, in case of Preeti Gupta Vs. State of Jharkhand &
Ors. AIR 2010 SC 3363, it is held that, when there is no specific
5 M.Cr.C.No. 11576/2015
allegation in the complaint against the sister-in-law and other. Appellants
are residing at different place nor with the complainant and her husband.
Their implication in the complaint is meant to harass and humiliate
husband's relatives. It is permitting complainant to pursue complaint,
would be abuse of process of law. Thus the complaint is liable to be
quashed.