Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.20 seconds)The Indian Ports Act, 1908
B.N. Elias And Co. Private Ltd. vs The Authority Appointed Under The ... on 7 April, 1960
The submission that the roster has been devised for the
purpose of bringing about a distribution of passengers
ignores the real purpose that the roster is intended to
serve, namely to ensure the even flow of traffic at landing
places. An attempt has been made to show that the roster was
prompted by malice, and we are referred to Smt. S.R. Venka-
taraman v. Union of India & Anr., [1979] 2 SCC 491, but we
see nothing to support the plea. We cannot accept that an
ulterior motive--the regulation of business--is behind the
roster. Brownells Limited v. The Ironmongers' Wages Board,
Brownelis Limited v. The Drapers' Wages Board, [1950] 81
C.L.R. 108 and Hanson v. Radcliffe Urban District Council, [
1922] 2 Ch. 490 do not help the appellants.
Section 7 in Bombay Police Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Bombay Police Act, 1951
1