Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.20 seconds)Section 65 in Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Article 12 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 63 in Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 64 in Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 66 in Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
State Of Assam & Ors vs Shri Kanak Chandra Dutta on 3 October, 1966
From the perusal of the provisions of Sections 61 to 66 of the Jodhpur Municipal Act, 1943 it is clear that it was the State Govt. who was the appointing authority of the employees of the Municipal Council and it could suspend or terminate or dismiss the employees of the then Jodhpur Municipal Council and, therefore, keeping in view the observations of their lordships of the Supreme Court in Mathwadas's case (supra) and State of Assam's case (supra) as also the observations made by the Gujarat High Court in G.L. Sholda's case (supra), the members of the petitioner-Association can be held to be the persons who have retired from a post under the State Govt. on 31.3.1953, when they have opted for the Municipal services.
General Officer Commanding-In-Chief & ... vs Subhash Chandra Yadav & Anr on 25 February, 1988
In General Officer Cornmanding-in-Chiefs case (supra), the question arose was whether the Central Govt. is entitled to frame the rules for transfer of the employees of the Canconment Boards under the substituted Clause (c) of Sub-section (2) of Section 280 of the Cantonments Act. Their lordships of the Supreme Court have held that, the transfer of employee from the Cantonment Board to another violates the autonomy of the autonomous bodies. It was further observed that it was neither a centralised service nor was it a service at the State level and it was pointed out that any such transfer would means termination of the services of the employee from the Cantonment Board from where he was transferred and a fresh appointment to the Cantonment Board where he joins on his transfer.
State Of Rajasthan vs Rajasthan Pensioner Samaj on 23 April, 1991
In this respect, reliance has been placed on certain observations of their lordships of the Supreme Court in State of Raj. v. Rajasthan Pensioner Samaj , wherein it was observed that the Contributory Provident Fund retirees and employees opting for pension scheme form different classes. The Contributory Provident Fund retirees cannot as of right switch over to pension scheme and get benefits granted to pension scheme retirees.