Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 24 (0.29 seconds)Section 279 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 397 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 401 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
State Of Punjab vs Saurabh Bakshi on 30 March, 2015
32. At this stage, this Court also cannot lose sight of
the stern observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in
State of Punjab versus Saurabh Bakshi 2015 (5) SCC 182,
wherein it has been observed as follows:-
Suleman Rehiman Mulani & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 1 December, 1967
In Suieman Rahiman Mulani v.
State of Maharashtra the accused who was
driving a car only with a learner's licence without
.
Bhalchandra Alias Bapu & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 11 April, 1968
a trainer by his side, had injured a person. It was
held that that by itself was not sufficient to
warrant a conviction under Section 304A. It
would be different if it can be established as in
the case of Bhalchandra v. State of Maharashtra
of
that deaths and injuries caused by the
contravention of a prohibition in respect of the
substances which are highly dangerous as in the
rt
case of explosives in a cracker factory which are
considered to be of a highly hazardous and
dangerous nature having sensitive composition
where even friction or percussion could cause an
explosion, that contravention would be the
causa causans.