Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.22 seconds)

Adit (It) 2(2), Mumbai vs Ups Supply Chain Solutions Inc. Usa, ... on 3 March, 2021

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2024 at 21:24:18 corroborative evidence has been brought on record to demonstrate that the assessee carries on business in India wholly or partly through a fixed place of business. That being the factual position emerging on record, applying the ratio laid down in the judicial precedents cited before us by the learned council for the assessee, we hold that the assessee does not have any PE in India. That being the fact, the provisions of section 44DA would not be applicable. Therefore, in our view, the income offered by the assessee under section 115A read with section 9(1)(vii) of the Act has to be accepted. More so, considering assessee's contention that in the preceding assessment years, similarly declared income has been accepted has not been controverted by the Revenue. Accordingly, we delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer under section 44DA of the Act."
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 0 - Cited by 8 - Full Document
1