Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.51 seconds)
Dr. Sapana Verma & Ors vs The Magadh University, Bodh Gaya ... on 15 May, 2018 cites

T. C. Basappa vs T. Nagappa And Another on 5 May, 1954

Such a construction defeats the purpose of the article itself. To say this is not to say that the High Courts can function arbitrarily under this Article. Some limitations are implicit in the article and others may be evolved to direct the article through defined channels. This interpretation has been accepted by this Court in T. C. Basappa v. Nagappa, and Irani v. State of Madras
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 605 - B K Mukherjea - Full Document

P. J. Irani vs The State Of Madras on 21 April, 1961

13. Adverting to the submission of Mr. Prasad that the policy of two promotions in the career as per the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of State of Tripura & Ors (supra) is concerned, the Court is of the view that on careful scrutiny of the Career Advancement Scheme, it is evident that the Career Advancement Scheme provide for financial upgradation on completion of certain period of time as teacher. Avenues of two promotion is available to a teacher and it cannot be read that without consideration of merit teachers should be granted promotion only on the length of service.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 197 - Full Document

Dwarka Nath vs Income-Tax Officer, Special Circle ... on 29 March, 1965

8. Referring to the submission of the petitioners that the Court has limited power of judicial review. The Court does not Patna High Court CWJC No.7547 of 2017 dt.15-05-2018 7/12 find any merit in such submission. Under Article 226 of the Constitution, the power is plenary and there is no limitation in the matter of exercise of jurisdiction of constitutional court. The restriction in exercise of jurisdiction is self-imposed. It is relevant to quote the observations of Justice Subba Rao in the case of Dwarka Nath vs. Income-Tax Officer, Special, reported in 1965 (3) SCR 536 where his Lordships speaking for the Court has explained the scope of article 226 of the Constitution in the following words:
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 339 - Full Document
1