Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.46 seconds)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Prem Singh vs State Of Haryana on 2 September, 2011
19. No efforts were made to handover the seal to independent public
persons after its use. The seal remained with the police officials only. The
handing over of the seal to public witness has not been proved hence it
cannot be ruled out that the opportunity to tamper with the case property was
very much there as the seal remained within the possession of police
officials. This also creates a doubt upon the prosecution story. Reference
may be made to the judgment titled as "Prem Singh Vs. State" reported as
1996 CRI. L. J/ 3604 in this respect.
Sadhu Singh Roda S/O Buta Singh Etc vs State Of Punjab on 25 January, 1984
In "Sadhu Singh Vs. State of Punjab" 1997 (3) Crime 55 the
Punjab & Haryana High Court observed that
"all the same, the prosecution must show a genuine attempt having
been made to join a public witness or that they were not available. A
stereo-type statement of non availability will not be sufficient
particularly when at the relevant time, it was not difficult to procure
the service of public witness. This reflects adversely on the
prosecution version".
Adil, Irfan And Abdul Tahir vs State Of U.P. on 19 April, 2008
21. There is nothing on record to show at what time the police
personnel proceeded for patrolling duty. Strangely none of the witness could
tell as to what time they proceeded for such patrolling. No DD entries have
been placed on record to establish the departure and arrival of the said police
officials on patrolling. Reference may be made to the judgment titled as
Pappu alias Irfan Vs State of UP,2005[1] JCC [Narcotics]31). As per
chapter 22 rule 49 of the Punjab Police Rules, which is reproduced as under;
Rattan Lal vs State Of Punjab on 10 April, 1964
It has been held in Rattan Lal Vs. State 1987 (2) Crimes 29 the
Hon'ble Delhi Hgih Court held that;
The Delhi Excise Act, 2009
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Roop Chand And Others vs The State Of Haryana on 16 March, 2009
In "Roop Chand Vs. The State of Haryana 1999 (1) C.L.R, the
Punjab & Haryana High Court held as under:-
Mr. Pawan Kumar Chadha vs Adm (Hq) Revenue Department, Govt. Of ... on 17 August, 2009
L.J. 3604, PAWAN KUMAR VS. DELHI ADMN 1989 Crl.
1