Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.19 seconds)Ricardson Hindustan Ltd. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 28 June, 1988
In this connection, he cites the case-law of Richardson Hindustan Limited v. Union of India as in 1988 (37) E.L.T. 496 (Bom.) and M.J. Exporters as reported in 1992 (60) E.L.T. 161 (S.C.) wherein it has been that the interpretation of import policy given in writing by the C.C.I. & E. (now DGFT) is binding on Customs authorities and that the Joint C.C.I. & E. can issue such clarification. Therefore the order-in-original which has brushed aside this clarification as being against the policy as well as the Customs Tariff is totally illegal and erroneous and the order-in-appeal impugned which upholds the same also suffers from the same infirmity.
1