Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.31 seconds)Section 4 in The Punjab Religious Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1997 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in The Punjab Religious Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1997 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Punjab Religious Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1997 [Entire Act]
Section 8 in The Punjab Religious Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1997 [Entire Act]
Sushil Kumar Metha vs Gobind Ram Bohra on 10 November, 1989
Counsel for the petitioners, in support of his submission has
relied upon a decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Sushil Kumar
Mehta vs. Gobind Ram Bohra (dead) through his LRs (1990) 1 SCC 193
to contend that if the ejectment order has been passed and civil court has no
jurisdiction, tenant can always take this plea even at the stage of execution
of the decree and the decree passed against him would not operate as
resjudicata.
Section 3 in The Punjab Religious Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1997 [Entire Act]
The Punjab Religious Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1997
1