Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.18 seconds)The Copyright Act, 1957
Fx Enterprise Solutions India Pvt. Ltd vs Hyundai Motor India Limited (36/2014) ... on 14 June, 2017
5. Now, it is well settled that in an appeal against exercise
of discretion by the Court of first instance, the power of the
Apex Court to interfere with the exercise of discretion is
restrictive. Merely because, on facts, the appellate Court would
have concluded differently from that of the Court below, would
not, by itself, provide justification for an appellate Court to
interfere. To justify interference, the appellant would have to
demonstrate that the discretion has been shown to have been
exercised arbitrarily, or perversely or where the Court had
ignored settled principles of law regarding grant or refusal of
interlocutory injunction. An appeal against exercise of
discretion is an appeal on principle. (Wendor Limited v. Antox
India Private Limited, 1990 Supplementary SCC 727 ; Skyline
Education Institution (India) Private Limited (2010) 2 SCC 142).
The Trade Marks Act, 1999
The Companies Act, 1956
Section 2 in The Copyright Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
1