Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.20 seconds)
Deepti Aggarwal vs Govt. Of Nctd on 10 August, 2018 cites

Srishti vs Govt Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors on 23 May, 2017

4.1 Learned counsel for the applicant placed reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Govt. of NCT of Delhi and ors. vs. Sachin Gupta in Writ Petition (C) No.1520/2012 and other connected cases decided on 7.8.2013 in support of the claim of the applicant. He further submitted that applicant has done M.Sc. in Anthropology and, therefore, possesses better/higher qualification than prescribed in the Recruitment Rules for the post of TGT (Natural Science) (Female). Counsel for the applicant has also placed reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Srishti vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors. in Writ Petition (C) No.10392/2016 decided on 23.5.2017 in support of his contentions.
Delhi High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 4 - A Malhotra - Full Document

The University Of Mysore And Anr vs C. D. Govinda Rao And Anr on 26 August, 1963

8. It is a settled law that in academic matters, unless there is a clear violation of statutory provisions, the Regulations or the Notification issued, the Courts shall keep their hands off since those issues fall within the domain of the experts. The Hon'ble Apex Court in University of Mysore vs. C.D. Govinda Rao, AIR 1965 SC 491, Tariq Islam vs. Aligarh Muslim University (2001) 8 SCC 546 and Rajbir Singh Dalal vs. Chaudhary Devi Lal University (2008) 9 SCC 284, 7 has taken the view that the Court shall not generally sit in appeal over the opinion expressed by expert academic bodies and normally it is wise and safe for the Courts to leave the decision of academic experts who are more familiar with the problem they face, than the Courts generally are.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 754 - P B Gajendragadkar - Full Document

Tariq Islam vs Aligarh Muslim University & Ors on 9 October, 2001

8. It is a settled law that in academic matters, unless there is a clear violation of statutory provisions, the Regulations or the Notification issued, the Courts shall keep their hands off since those issues fall within the domain of the experts. The Hon'ble Apex Court in University of Mysore vs. C.D. Govinda Rao, AIR 1965 SC 491, Tariq Islam vs. Aligarh Muslim University (2001) 8 SCC 546 and Rajbir Singh Dalal vs. Chaudhary Devi Lal University (2008) 9 SCC 284, 7 has taken the view that the Court shall not generally sit in appeal over the opinion expressed by expert academic bodies and normally it is wise and safe for the Courts to leave the decision of academic experts who are more familiar with the problem they face, than the Courts generally are.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 154 - Full Document

Rajbir Singh Dalal vs Chaudhari Devi Lal University & Anr on 6 August, 2008

8. It is a settled law that in academic matters, unless there is a clear violation of statutory provisions, the Regulations or the Notification issued, the Courts shall keep their hands off since those issues fall within the domain of the experts. The Hon'ble Apex Court in University of Mysore vs. C.D. Govinda Rao, AIR 1965 SC 491, Tariq Islam vs. Aligarh Muslim University (2001) 8 SCC 546 and Rajbir Singh Dalal vs. Chaudhary Devi Lal University (2008) 9 SCC 284, 7 has taken the view that the Court shall not generally sit in appeal over the opinion expressed by expert academic bodies and normally it is wise and safe for the Courts to leave the decision of academic experts who are more familiar with the problem they face, than the Courts generally are.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 252 - M Katju - Full Document
1