Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.27 seconds)Section 304A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Jatinder Pal Singh & Others vs State Of Punjab on 16 September, 1999
In the light of
these authorities the conviction and the sentence imposed upon the
Jatinder Singh vs. State
:9:
appellant/convict/accused by the learned trial court for the offence under Section
279 IPC are liable to be set aside.
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 304 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
George & Ors vs State Of Kerala & Anr on 18 March, 1998
It would be proper to take
note of what was stated by this Court in George and Ors.
v. State of Kerala and Anr., (1998(4) SCC 605 : 1998(2)
RCR(Crl.) 199 (SC)) regarding statements contained in
an inquest report.
Surinder Singh And Anr vs State Of U.P on 5 September, 2003
"In Surinder Singh v State
of UP, AIR 2003 SC 3811, 2003(10) SCC 26, 2003 (7)
Scale 184, 2003(Sup1 ) JT 226, 2003(Sup3 ) SCR 401,
2004 SCC(Cri) 717, 2003 Cr LJ 4446 (SC), 2003(4)
RCR (Criminal) 575, 2004(1) Apex Criminal 572,
2003(4) Crimes 393, it was held:
Anil vs State Of Haryana on 10 May, 2007
From the above case law it is clear that the discrepancy in the site plan
is not enough to discard the prosecution case. Thus, I do not agree with learned
counsel for appellant/conduct that merely because the distances are not shown in the
site plan the prosecution case has become doubtful.
Shiva Karam Payaswami Tewar vs State Of Maharashtra on 21 January, 2009
(Shiva Ram v
State 1965 All 196, (1965) 1 Cr LJ 524; Ranjit Singh v State of Haryana 1988
Chand Cr Cases 516 (P&H)) IPC. Our Delhi High Court has also taken a similar
view and it was held that there was no need to impose any separate sentence for
minor sentence under Section 279 because the offence under Sections 304A and
338 IPC, are similar offence in aggravated forms.
Ranjit Singh vs State Of Haryana on 11 September, 2008
(Shiva Ram v
State 1965 All 196, (1965) 1 Cr LJ 524; Ranjit Singh v State of Haryana 1988
Chand Cr Cases 516 (P&H)) IPC. Our Delhi High Court has also taken a similar
view and it was held that there was no need to impose any separate sentence for
minor sentence under Section 279 because the offence under Sections 304A and
338 IPC, are similar offence in aggravated forms.