Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.24 seconds)

Disha Panchal vs Union Of India The Secretary on 13 June, 2018

26. He submits that the decision in Disha Panchal (supra) is not applicable to the situation in hand, inasmuch as in the said case compensatory marks were granted due to power cut during the Computer Based Test (CBT), which principle cannot be made applicable to the present case as NEET (UG) is an OMR based examination conducted in pen and paper. He submits that unlike CBT, time consumption by a candidate in attempting one question cannot be accurately assessed in pen-paper based examination due to absence of audit logs. That apart, in the said decision, a Grievance Redressal Committee, appointed by the Court, had come to a conclusion that there were multiple disruptions due to power shortage which W.P.(C) 8483/2025 Page 7 of 23 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:DEEPAK SINGH Signing Date:26.07.2025 19:42:03 actually caused loss of time to 4690 candidates as the computers shut down due to lack of power back-up, which is not the situation in the present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 16 - U U Lalit - Full Document

Vaishnavi Sandeep Maniyar vs Central Board Of Sec. Edu., A National ... on 15 June, 2018

18. He contends that since crucial loss of time is not in dispute, the petitioner ought to have been compensated by the respondent no.1/NTA in terms of the normalisation principle as laid down in Disha Panchal (supra), W.P.(C) 8483/2025 Page 5 of 23 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:DEEPAK SINGH Signing Date:26.07.2025 19:42:03 which was also followed by the High Court of Bombay in Vaishnavi Sandeep Maniyar v. Central Board of Secondary Education & Ors., 2018 SCC OnLine Bom 8455. He submits that the said decision of the Bombay High Court was assailed before the Hon'ble Apex Court by way of SLP (C) No.15771/2018, but the same was dismissed.
Bombay High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 2 - Z A Haq - Full Document
1