Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.20 seconds)
State Bank Of India vs . Satyabir Singh. on 15 December, 2018 cites

Au Small Finance Bank Formerly Known As ... vs Satyabir Singh & Anr. on 15 May, 2018

In view of the foregoing reasons and discussion,   the suit of   the   plaintiff   is   hereby   decreed   in   favour   of   the   plaintiff   and against the defendant, for a sum of Rs.   3,17,238/­ (Rupees Three Lakhs Seventeen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Eight Only) along with pendentelite and future interest @ 9% per annum with monthly Page No. 4 / 5 CS/122/17 State Bank of India vs. Satyabir Singh.
Delhi High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - S Sachdeva - Full Document

Kamlesh Bhatia Wife Of Sh. Om Parkash ... vs N.R. Meena, Senior Superintendent Of ... on 26 November, 2012

7.   As   the   defendant   has   failed   to   appear   before   the   court despite due service and was proceeded ex­parte, the witness Sh. V. R. Meena was not subjected to any cross examination on behalf of the defendant   and   therefore,   his   testimony   has   remained   unrebutted, uncontroverted and unchallenged. It was obligatory on the part of the defendant to have repaid the amount which he had taken from the bank by honouring EMIs. It is a public money and the defendant has no right to illegally usurp the amount due to him. By not appearing in the matter, it shall be taken that defendant has accepted the case of the plaintiff in toto and has nothing to say in his defence else he would have come and defended his case.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 4 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1