Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.27 seconds)Article 323B in Constitution of India [Constitution]
L. Chandra Kumar vs Union Of India And Others on 18 March, 1997
In L. CHANDRA KUMAR v UNION OF INDIA, the apex court observed:
Article 309 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
R. N. Nanjundappa vs T. Thimmiah & Anr on 8 December, 1971
According to the petitioners, having regard to the decision of the apex court in R.N. NANJUNDAPPA v T. THIMMAIAH, regularization of appointment in exercise of executive power cannot be made by the executive if the same is in infraction of a rule made under proviso appended to Article 309 of the Constitution.
V.P. Shrivastava And Ors vs State Of M.P. And Ors on 2 February, 1996
7. A contention was raised before this Court that no party is required to be impleaded when the validity of a rule is challenged in view of the decision of the apex court in V.P. SRIVASTAVA v STATE OF M.P., . A plea was also raised that the validity of the said G.O.Ms. No. 802 has not been upheld by the Supreme Court as was wrongly mentioned by the Tribunal.
1