Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 34 (0.39 seconds)Section 311 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 233 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Trimukh Maroti Kirkan vs State Of Maharashtra on 11 October, 2006
This principal has been explained in the judgments of the Apex Court in the case of (1) Raj Kumar Prasad Tamarkar Vs. State of Bihar and another reported in (2007) 3 SCC (Cri) 716 paragraph-25, (2) Trimukh Maroti Kirkan Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in (2006) 10 SCC 681 paragraphs-15 and 18, and (3) State of Rajasthan Vs. Kashi Ram reported in (2006) 12 SCC 254 paragraph-22.
Section 60 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Paramjeet Singh @ Pamma vs State Of Uttarakhand on 27 September, 2010
So far as, the issue of absence of motive is concerned, we may record that the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Paramjeet Singh alias Pamma Vs. State of Uttarakhand reported in (2010) 10 SCC 439 paragraph 54 has specifically held as follows :
Section 302 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Raj Kumar Prasad Tamarkar à Appellants vs State Of Bihar & Anr. à Respondents on 4 January, 2007
This principal has been explained in the judgments of the Apex Court in the case of (1) Raj Kumar Prasad Tamarkar Vs. State of Bihar and another reported in (2007) 3 SCC (Cri) 716 paragraph-25, (2) Trimukh Maroti Kirkan Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in (2006) 10 SCC 681 paragraphs-15 and 18, and (3) State of Rajasthan Vs. Kashi Ram reported in (2006) 12 SCC 254 paragraph-22.
The State Of Gujarat vs Anirudhsing & Anr on 10 July, 1997
"54. So far as the issue of motive is concerned, the case is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in Suresh Chandra Bahri. Therefore, it does not require any further elaborate discussion. More so, if motive is proved that would supply a link in the chain of circumstantial evidence but the absence thereof cannot be a ground to reject the prosecution case. (Vide State of Gujarat v. Anirudhsing.)"