Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.38 seconds)Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Preeti Gupta & Anr vs State Of Jharkhand & Anr on 13 August, 2010
Reference at this stage can be made to a judgment of Hon'ble
the Supreme Court in a case of Preeti Gupta v. State of Jharkhand, 2010
(7) SCC 667 whereby it has been observed that a general attempt is made
by the complainant to rope the in-laws in criminal proceedings. This
infact is a process to extract money on account of matrimonial dispute
3 of 7
::: Downloaded on - 04-02-2017 07:44:51 :::
4
CRM-M No.13960 of 2016
between the complainant and her husband. In para 30 to 35, it has been
observed as under:-
Rajni Garg vs State Of Haryana & Anr on 14 November, 2014
Similar view has been taken by this Court in Rajni Vs. State
of Haryana and another, CRM-M-41402-2014 (decided on 29.02.2016),
wherein it has been held that in a matrimonial dispute, there is a general
tendency to implicate all the family members.
Sukhdeep Kaur And Anr vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 8 October, 2015
In Sukhdeep Kaur and
another Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2015 (4) RCR (Criminal) 892,
this Court while quashing an FIR under Sections 406/498-A IPC, has
observed that a tendency has developed for roping in all the relations of
husband in dowry cases in order to browbeat and pressurize the
immediate family of the husband.
1