Ranjit Singh vs Surinder Kaur & Ors on 14 January, 2014
15. Even otherwise, whatever case regarding cruelty the appellant
RAMESH KUMAR MALIK
2015.08.31 18:25
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
High Court Chandigarh
(333) FAO-M No. 126-M of 2004 (O&M) -6-
Ranjit Singh versus Surinder Kaur
wanted to project, would be razed because he condoned all previous acts of
cruelty when the compromise in the Lok Adalat happened and the parties
started living together. No cruelty later in point of time to that was pleaded.
It was stated that in April, 2000, the female child was got admitted in
Shivalik Public School, Ropar, but in the first week of May, 2000, the
respondent without knowledge of the appellant and/or his family withdrew
Tarandeep Kaur from that school and got her admitted in a school in
Mohali. Since 30.05.2000 the respondent did not join the company of the
appellant and they did not reside together ever since.