Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.28 seconds)

State Of Punjab vs Mohar Singh on 20 October, 1954

5) On the other hand, Mr. Rupesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue, has taken us though the impugned judgment and has argued that once there is a repeal 6 simpliciter, without any savings clause, the whole object of such a repeal was so that the general rule under Section 6 would apply, as a result of which the law laid down in State of Punjab vs. Mohar Singh, [1955] 1 SCR 893, would apply.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 312 - B K Mukherjea - Full Document
1   2 Next