Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 36 (0.26 seconds)The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Section 133 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Article 300A in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 31 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Ch. Tika Ramji & Others, Etc vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh & Others on 24 April, 1956
95.It was also found on facts in Tika Ram v. State of U.P.424 that there was no charge of mala fides levelled against the exercise of power and there was material available in support of the satisfaction on the part of the executive justifying the invocation of the provisions of Section 17. The position is no different in the present case. The High Court in the present matter went a step ahead and examined the bulky original record itself to find that there was full material available."
Nand Kishore Gupta & Ors vs State Of U.P.& Ors on 8 September, 2010
47.In Nand Kishore Gupta v. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in (2010) 10 SCC 282, the Supreme Court found that huge land required for project of construction of Express highway and industrial township Project lingering in litigation. The delay had already led to whopping escalation. If 5A enquiry is followed, it would have further escalated cost. It was waste of time and dispensation of 5A justified.
Jai Narain & Ors. Etc. Etc vs Union Of India & Ors on 29 November, 1995
Shri Goswami, learned Senior Counsel for the Union of India, has relied upon the judgment of this Court in Jai Narain v. Union of India4. It is true, as pointed out by Shri Sanghi, that the acquisition in this reported decision was made for the establishment of sewerage plant as per the direction of this Court and, therefore, there was urgency.