Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 34 (0.03 seconds)
M/S Greenways Through Its Partner vs Y.N. Gupta (Deceased) Through Its Lrs & ... on 5 August, 2024
cites
The Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958
Sky Land International Pvt. Ltd. vs Kavita P Lalwani on 25 May, 2012
63. Regarding the dispute over the suit property‟s number, it was
argued that both parties are clear about the property‟s identity, and it is
identifiable as per the site plan filed by the defendant in Civil Suit No.
149/10. The plaintiff submitted that even in the reply dated 10th October,
2013 to the termination notice, the suit property was clearly identified,
and compliance with notifying termination was duly observed, as per Sky
Land International Pvt. Ltd. v. Kavita P Lalwani (Supra).
Section 106 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 116 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 35 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
Section 33 in The Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Parivar Seva Sansthan vs Dr.(Mrs.) Veena Kalra & Ors. on 7 July, 2000
In the case of Pariwar Sewa Sansthan v. Dr.
(Mrs.) Veena Kalra, AIR 2000 Delhi 349 the Court examined
at length the provisions and the need for an admission to be
unequivocal and positive. The admission would obviously
have the consequences of arriving at that conclusion without
determination of any question and evidence.
Balraj Taneja & Anr vs Sunil Madan & Anr on 8 September, 1999
The Court while
relying upon the case of Balraj Taneja v. Sunil Madan,
(1999) 8 SCC 396 : AIR 1999 SC 3381 and Dudh Nath
Pandey v. Suresh Chandra Bhattasali, (1986) 3 SCC 360 :