Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.23 seconds)

Needle Industries (India) Ltd., & Ors vs Needle Industries Newey (India) ... on 7 May, 1981

Section 405 is only an enabling provision to implead any managing director or any other director or the manager, of a company or any other person, who has not been impleaded as a respondent to any application under Section 397 or 398, provided that the Company Law Board is satisfied that there is sufficient cause for such impleadment. There is, however, no provision against the impleadment of a company. Furthermore, the respondents have not made out any prejudice which may be suffered on account of the impleadment of the company as a party to the proceedings before the Company Law Board. The parties are not to suffer on account of mere technicalities as laid down in Needle Industries (India) Ltd. v. Needle Industries Newey (India) Holding Ltd. . Therefore, there is no merit in the plea of the respondents. The prayer for amendment made by the applicant is allowed and the applicant is directed to file an amended petition by September 11, 2006, and serve a copy on the respondents. The matter is listed for hearing on September 15, 2006, at 2.30 p.m. to consider the interim reliefs claimed by the petitioner. Ordered accordingly.
Supreme Court of India Cites 65 - Cited by 317 - Y V Chandrachud - Full Document

Sh. Dayaram Agarwal, Kanta Agarwal, ... vs Ashok Industries Pvt. Ltd. And Ors. on 16 June, 2005

This has been followed by this Board in Dayaram Agarwal v. Ashok Industries P. Ltd. 2006 130 Comp Cas 172 2006 66 SCL 328, wherein it has been held that mere technicalities cannot frustrate harsh, burdensome and wrongful action of the respondents under the provisions of Section 397/398 of the Act. The board of directors of the company has already passed a resolution by circulation, authorising the managing director to represent the company in the Company Law Board proceedings. The company is a closely held family company, but the petitioner is excluded to take part in the day-to-day management of the company. The majority of directors are respondents and, therefore, it has become necessary to include the company as a party to the company petition. In these circumstances, Shri Srinivasan urged for appropriate directions on the prayer made in the application.
Company Law Board Cites 24 - Cited by 5 - Full Document
1