Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (2.50 seconds)

Panney @ Pratap Narain Shukla & Anr vs State Of U.P on 9 December, 2009

Perusal of the order passed by the District Magistrate indicates that order has been passed considering the case of the applicant in comparison with Pratap Narain Pandey (Supra) and it has been found that the applicant had not worked regularly and had worked as seasonal collection Amin and there were obstructions in his services. Opposite parties have also taken a ground that the services rendered by the applicant as seasonal collection Amin can not be counted as qualifying service for the purpose of pension in view of the Uttar Pradesh Qualifying Service for Pension and Validation Act, 2021.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 14 - Full Document
1