Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.38 seconds)Section 3 in The Wealth-Tax Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
The Wealth-Tax Act, 1957
Section 21 in The Wealth-Tax Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Wealth-Tax Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
The Income Tax Act, 1961
The Commissioner Of Wealth Tax, Kerala, ... vs Puthiya Ponmanichintakam Wakf on 26 July, 1965
In this respect he pointed to the provisions of section 41(1), first proviso, of the Indian Income-tax Act, and the construction put upon that proviso in several cases; particularly he relied upon Commissioner of Income-tax v. Puthiya Ponmanichintakam Wakf ., Commissioner of Income-tax v. Manilal Dhanji and Commissioner of Income-tax v. Lady Ratanbai Mathuradas [1968] 67 I. T. R. 504. to urge that it must be held that the interest of the assessee and his wife in the present case was indeterminate and unknown.
Section 41 in The Wealth-Tax Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 1 in The Wealth-Tax Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax Bombay vs Manilal Dhanji, Bombay on 31 January, 1962
In this respect he pointed to the provisions of section 41(1), first proviso, of the Indian Income-tax Act, and the construction put upon that proviso in several cases; particularly he relied upon Commissioner of Income-tax v. Puthiya Ponmanichintakam Wakf ., Commissioner of Income-tax v. Manilal Dhanji and Commissioner of Income-tax v. Lady Ratanbai Mathuradas [1968] 67 I. T. R. 504. to urge that it must be held that the interest of the assessee and his wife in the present case was indeterminate and unknown.