Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.30 seconds)Section 41 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
Section 38 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
Section 17 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
Section 36 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
Section 61 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
R.G. Lakhmidas And Co. vs Sir Dorab Tata on 6 October, 1926
15. Another suggestion which I expressly leave open to future argument is that if it could be said that at any time this particular sale certificate was "admitted in evidence" within the meaning of Section 36 of the Indian Stamp Act then no objection in that suit could be taken thereafter on the ground that it had not been duly stamped. The only exception would be that if the matter was taken before an appellate Court under Section 61 either on the application of the Collector or otherwise then in that case the matter could be put right and the proper penalty could be recovered As an instance of that I may refer to Lahhmidas & Co. v. Sir Dorab Tata (1926) 29 Bom. L.R. 19, 44 where this appellate Court on its Original Side impounded certain documents which in its opinion had been improperly admitted in evidence with an insufficient stamp in the Court of first instance, and adopted the procedure under a 61.