Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.19 seconds)Section 14 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
Section 96 in Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 [Entire Act]
R.B. Moondra And Co. vs Mst. Bhanwari And Anr. on 22 April, 1969
10. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and after carefully going through the case-law cited, I am of opinion that the submission made on behalf of the appellant cannot be accepted for reasons stated hereinafter. All these decisions have considered the scope of Section 14 of
the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, as also Section 95 and Section 96 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. However, with respect, I am unable to subscribe to the view taken in the single Bench decision of the Rajasthan High Court in R. B. Moondra and Co. v. Mst. Bhanwari, AIR 1970 Raj 111.
The Trustees Of The Port Of Madras, ... vs Bombay Company (P.) Ltd. on 10 March, 1966
Similarly, in the decision in Trustees of the Port of Madras v. Bombay Co. P. Ltd. [1965-66] 29 FJR 328 ; AIR 1967 Mad 318, the point raised related to the scope of Section 12 of the Workmen's Compensation Act.