Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.19 seconds)

Dcit, Cc-Ii, Chandigarh vs M/S Steel Strips Wheels Limited, ... on 27 May, 2019

5. At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the issue is squarely covered by the various decisions of the Tribunal including the decision of the Tribunal in the case of "M/s Steel Strips Wheels Ltd. vs. DCIT" in ITA No.887/CHD/2019 and of the Hon'ble Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the case of "ACIT vs. Orient Bell Ltd." in ITA No.7534/DEL/2017.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 2 - Cited by 17 - Full Document

Acit, Circle- 19(1), New Delhi vs Orient Bell Ltd., New Delhi on 25 August, 2021

5. At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the issue is squarely covered by the various decisions of the Tribunal including the decision of the Tribunal in the case of "M/s Steel Strips Wheels Ltd. vs. DCIT" in ITA No.887/CHD/2019 and of the Hon'ble Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the case of "ACIT vs. Orient Bell Ltd." in ITA No.7534/DEL/2017.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi Cites 14 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras vs K. Srinivasan And K. Gopalan on 22 December, 1952

We further note that the Coordinate Kolkata Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Kanoria Chemicals & Industries Ltd (ITA No. 2184/Kol/2018) - 2021-TIOL-1835-ITAT-KOL (the Judicial Member herein being part of the Bench in the said decision); while relying upon the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. K. Srinivasan (1972) 83 ITR 346 has held that the tax includes surcharge and cess. At this stage, it will be relevant to refer to the provisions of section 115JAA which reads as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 155 - Full Document
1