Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.21 seconds)Section 173 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 156 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 289 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Aswini Kumar Ghose And Anr. vs Arabinda Bose And Anr. on 12 December, 1952
14. it is one of the rules of interpretation of statutes not to brush aside words in a statute as being inapposite surplusage, if they can have appropriate application in circumstances conceivably within the contemplation of the statute. (See Aswini Kumar Ghose v. Arabinda Bose, AIR 1952 SC 369).
Bachchan Lal vs The State on 19 October, 1956
8. The next case is that of Bachchan Lal v. State, AIR 1957 All 184. In this case also the confession was recorded during the preliminary enquiry, and, in fact, after the Committing Magistrate had recorded the statements of certain witnesses. Purporting to rely upon their earlier decision in AIR 1955 All 138, Raghubar Dayal and James, JJ. held that: