Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.21 seconds)Lata Wadhwa & Ors vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 16 August, 2001
In Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v. Laxman Iyer and another (2003) 8 SCC 731, a two-Judge Bench while deciding the issue of award of compensation under Sections 110-A and 110- B of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, referred to the judgments in Lata Wadhwa's case and M.S. Grewal's case.
M.S. Grewal & Anr vs Deep Chand Sood & Ors on 24 August, 2001
In Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v. Laxman Iyer and another (2003) 8 SCC 731, a two-Judge Bench while deciding the issue of award of compensation under Sections 110-A and 110- B of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, referred to the judgments in Lata Wadhwa's case and M.S. Grewal's case.
The Municipal Corporation Of Greater ... vs Shri Laxman Iyer And Anr on 27 October, 2003
In Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v. Laxman Iyer and another (2003) 8 SCC 731, a two-Judge Bench while deciding the issue of award of compensation under Sections 110-A and 110- B of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, referred to the judgments in Lata Wadhwa's case and M.S. Grewal's case.
General Manager, Kerala S.R.T.C vs Susamma Thomas on 6 January, 1993
Though, Section 163A does not, in terms apply to the cases in which claim for compensation is filed under Section 166 of the Act, in the absence of any other definite criteria for determination of compensation payable to the dependents of a non-earning housewife/mother, it would be reasonable to rely upon the criteria specified in clause (6) of the Second Schedule and then apply appropriate multiplier keeping in view the judgments of this Court in General Manager Kerala State Road Transport Corporation v. Susamma Thomas (Mrs.) and others, U.P. S.R.T.C. v. Trilok Chandra, Sarla Verma (Smt.) and others v. Delhi Transport Corporation and another and also take guidance from the judgment in Lata Wadhwa's case.
U.P. State Road Transport Corporation ... vs Trilok Chandra & Others on 7 May, 1996
Though, Section 163A does not, in terms apply to the cases in which claim for compensation is filed under Section 166 of the Act, in the absence of any other definite criteria for determination of compensation payable to the dependents of a non-earning housewife/mother, it would be reasonable to rely upon the criteria specified in clause (6) of the Second Schedule and then apply appropriate multiplier keeping in view the judgments of this Court in General Manager Kerala State Road Transport Corporation v. Susamma Thomas (Mrs.) and others, U.P. S.R.T.C. v. Trilok Chandra, Sarla Verma (Smt.) and others v. Delhi Transport Corporation and another and also take guidance from the judgment in Lata Wadhwa's case.
Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009
Though, Section 163A does not, in terms apply to the cases in which claim for compensation is filed under Section 166 of the Act, in the absence of any other definite criteria for determination of compensation payable to the dependents of a non-earning housewife/mother, it would be reasonable to rely upon the criteria specified in clause (6) of the Second Schedule and then apply appropriate multiplier keeping in view the judgments of this Court in General Manager Kerala State Road Transport Corporation v. Susamma Thomas (Mrs.) and others, U.P. S.R.T.C. v. Trilok Chandra, Sarla Verma (Smt.) and others v. Delhi Transport Corporation and another and also take guidance from the judgment in Lata Wadhwa's case.
Cholan Roadways Corporation Ltd vs Ahmed Thambi on 3 August, 2006
18. Tribunal has failed to award any amount under the head Loss of amenities. Considering the nature of injuries, extent of disablement and following the above decision, Rs.50,000/- is awarded under the said head. In addition to the above, we deem it fit to award a sum of Rs.2,000/- for damages to clothes and articles. Medical expenses of Rs.4,41,141/- is substantiated by production of Ex.P7-Medical Bill series and therefore, the same is sustained. In view of the re-working, total compensation due and payable to Rajasubhashini/claimant in MCOP No.147/2012/1st respondent in CMA No.1479/2015 and first Cross Objector in Cross Objection No.64/2016 works out to Rs.15,39,141/-. For the sake of convenience, the detailed compensation are as follows:
Reshma Kumari & Ors vs Madan Mohan & Anr on 2 April, 2013
20. Insofar as the challenge to the loss of contribution to the family of Rs.24,71,400/- in MCOP No.148/2012, the same is sustained. Going through the materials on record, we are of the view that the same has been arrived at by applying proper principles of law. Therefore, it is sustained. Compensation of Rs.25,000/- awarded under the head loss of love and affection to the father aged about 70 years is less. It is enhanced to Rs.50,000/-. Similarly, Rs.25,000/- awarded under the head loss of love and affection to the minor is less. Following the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Reshma Kumari and others v. Madan Mohan reported in (2009) 13 SCC 422, the same is enhanced to Rs.1,00,000/- each, to the minor. The Tribunal has awarded Rs.1,00,000/- to the widow under the head loss of consortium, which we deem it just and reasonable and hence the same is sustained. The Tribunal has awarded Rs.10,000/- under the head funeral expenses.
Smt. Rajesh And Others vs Rajbir Singh And Others on 29 January, 2010
In Rajesh vs. Rajbir Singh, reported in 2013 (2) TN MAC 55 (SC) = 2013 (9) SCC 54, the Hon'ble Apex Court, awarded Rs.25,000/- towards funeral expenses, we deem it fit to award Rs.20,000/- under the head funeral expenses. The Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.10,000/- under the head Transportation, and it does not require any modification. The Tribunal has not awarded any amount under the head damages to clothes and articles. Hence we deem it fit to award a sum of Rs.2,000/- under the said head. The Tribunal, has not awarded any amount under the head loss of estate. Besides loss of love and affection of his father, minor child have also lost the estate. Hence, we deem it fit to award a sum of Rs.10,000/- under the head loss of estate to the minor child.