Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.28 seconds)Section 5 in Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Act, 1986 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Act, 1986 [Entire Act]
Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Act, 1986
Dadaji Alias Dina vs Sukhdeobabu & Ors on 7 November, 1979
In Dadaji vs. Sukhdeobabu, AIR 1980 S.C. 150, the
Supreme Court was pleased to observe that "it is well known
that punctuation marks by themselves do not control the meaning
::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 14:41:12 :::
22
of a statute when its meaning is otherwise obvious. What the
Court must see is the object of the Act.
THE CONSTITUTION (FIFTY-SECOND AMENDMENT) ACT, 1985
D. N. Sanghavi & Sons vs Ambalal Tribhuwan Das on 9 January, 1974
In that context the
learned Counsel for the respondent Nos.3 to 10 had brought to
our attention the observations of the Supreme Court in a D.N.
Sanghavi & Sons vs. Ambalal Tribhuwan Das, (1974) 1 SCC 708,
where the Supreme Court in the case of letting under the Rent
Act as under:-
The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961
The Delhi Rent Act, 1995
1