Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.03 seconds)Section 36 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
Section 61 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
Section 33 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 38 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
The Indian Stamp Act, 1899
Section 32 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
Thiru John & Anr vs Returning Officer & Ors on 12 April, 1977
In another judgment of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of John v. Returning Officer reported in
AIR 1977 SC 1724, it has been held that an admission, if clearly and
unequivocally made, is the best evidence against the party making it and
though not conclusive, shifts the onus on to the maker on the principle that
what a party himself admits to be true may reasonably be presumed to to so
and until the presumption is rebutted the fact admitted must be taken to be
established.
Union Of India vs Moksh Builders And Financers Ltd. And ... on 27 October, 1976
26.Again the learned counsel for the respondents relied upon the
judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India v. Moksh
Builders and Financiers Ltd., reported in AIR 1977 SC 409 for the proposition
that an admission by a party is substantive evidence of the fact admitted and
admissions duly proved are admissible evidence irrespective of whether the
party making them appeared in the witness box or not and whether that party
when appearing as witness was confronted with those statements in case it
made a statement contrary to those admissions.