Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.26 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 302 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
State Of Rajasthan vs Sohan Lal And Ors on 20 April, 2004
[Vide State of Rajasthan vs. Sohan Lal and Others, (2004) 5 SCC 573]"
State Of Karnataka vs Hemareddy Alias Vemareddy And Anr on 27 January, 1981
14. It is also a settled legal position that in acquittal appeals, the appellate Court is not required to rewrite the judgment or to give fresh reasonings, when the reasons assigned by the Court below are found to be just and proper. Such principle is laid down by the Apex Court in the case of "STATE OF KARNATAKA VS. HEMAREDDY", AIR 1981, SC 1417, wherein it is held as under:
State Of Punjab vs Madan Mohan Lal Verma on 12 August, 2013
16. Further, in the case of "STATE OF PUNJAB VS. MADAN MOHAN LAL VERMA", (2013) 14 SCC 153, the Apex Court has held as under:
Jayaswamy vs State Of Karnataka on 1 June, 2018
17. The Apex Court recently in Jayaswamy vs. State of Karnataka, (2018) 7 SCC 219, has laid down the principles for laying down the powers of appellate court in re-appreciating the evidence in a case where the State has preferred an appeal against acquittal, which read as follows:
Ramanand Yadav vs Prabhu Nath Jha And Ors on 31 October, 2003
.........................It is relevant to note the observations of this Court in the case of Ramanand Yadav vs. Prabhu Nath Jha & Ors., (2003) 12 SCC 606, which reads thus: